Warning: Parameter 1 to Language::getMagic() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/govitwik/public_html/w/includes/StubObject.php on line 58
President's Management Agenda - GovITwiki


President's Management Agenda

From GovITwiki

Jump to: navigation, search
An Introduction: The PMA's Relationship to IT

The idea behind the President's management Agenda is 14 initiatives designed to create a government that is focused on results and is more accessible to its citizens. It's also an attempt by the president to set clear priorities for government agencies as they decide where to target their information technology (IT) investments. The initiatives are outlined below.

Governmentwide Initiatives

  • Strategic Management of Human Capital
  • Competitive Sourcing
  • Improving Financial Performance
  • Expanded Electronic Government
  • Budget & Performance Integration

Program Initiatives

  • Faith-Based and Community Initiative
  • Privatization of Military Housing
  • Better Research and Development Investment Criteria
  • Elimination of Fraud and Error in Student Aid Programs and Deficiencies in Financial Management
  • Housing and Urban Development Management and Performance
  • Broadened Health Insurance Coverage Through State Initiatives
  • A "Right-Sized" Overseas Presence
  • Reform of Food Aid Programs
  • Coordination of Veterans Affairs and Defense Programs and Systems


Contents

History of the President's Management Agency

The agenda was originally unveiled in August, 2001. That document simply titled The President's Management Agenda, and labeled for fiscal Year 2002, can be found on the White House Web site.

The agenda sets a baseline for the administration's government reform priorities. It's similar to the National Performance Review plan outlined by Vice President Gore's reinventing government campaign of the late 1990s. But Bush's document focuses strongly on just a few major initiatives.

Another requirement is that the Office of Management and Budget requires quarterly financial audits from certain agencies. These audits are a very visible way of holding agencies accountable for their measured performance. Scorecards are available at results.gov.

A series of reports on the various requirements also are available.

Current Situation

The Executive Branch Management Scorecard tracks how well the departments and major agencies are executing the five government-wide management initiatives. The scorecards are posted each quarter.


The Stoplight Scoring System
The scorecard employs a simple grading system:

  • Green for success,
  • Yellow for mixed results, and
  • Red for unsatisfactory.

Status Scores for "status" (on the left side) are based on the scorecard standards for success. The standards for success were developed by the President's Management Council and discussed with experts throughout government and academe, including the National Academy of Public Administration. They have subsequently been refined with continued experience implementing the President's Management Agenda. Under each of these standards, an agency is "green" or "yellow" if it meets all of the standards for success listed in the respective column, and "red" if it has any one of a number of serious flaws listed in the "red" column.

Information technology vendors who wish to sell to the government often review these listings to see which agencies as red. This warning sign may indicate that the agency is in need of a specific solution to help them meet this requirement.

Future

It's highly likely that the focus on budget and performance integration will continue at OMB for the foreseeable future. What's less clear is how the President's Management Agenda might change after a new president is elected in 2008. It may morph, fragment, or continue under the same or a different name. What IS clear is that the program is viewed as being successful enough that the concept is likely to caqrry on. Expect to see a renewed emphasis on improved financial performance, projects and system investments that are tied to direct business objectives, more competitive sourcing and improved eGovernment, though the phrase eGovernment will likely fall into disuse in a few years.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report entitled Sustained Improvement in Federal Financial Management Is Crucial to Addressing Our Nation’s Accountability and Fiscal Stewardship Challenges (GAO-07-607T) issued in March, 2007, states that "certain material weaknesses in financial reporting and other limitations on the scope of GAO’s work resulted in conditions that continued to prevent GAO from being able to provide Congress and the American people an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. government are fairly stated in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles." For that reason, there is strong ongoing interest in improving and consolidating the federal government's financial management systems.

Advice for This Government Market Space

Both agencies and vendors should pay close attention to the quarterly scorecards. these rankings clearly show where agencies need to focus their efforts.

Management Profile
Image:Prez_seal.jpg

Office of The President
PMA effort Coordinated by
The Office of Management & Budget
725 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20503
(202) 395-0342 (FEA PMO)

Web site


Mission:
The agenda is "an aggressive strategy for improving the management of the Federal government." According to OMB. It focuses on multiple areas of management weakness across the government where improvements and the most progress can be made. In many ways the president's management agenda follows some of the "Reinventing government" and ongoing eGovernment initiatives that were laid out by the previous administration. But the current management focus includes a scorecard approach with measurable results.


This page needs to be expanded. If you know about this technology area and how the government buys and uses this technology, please feel free to add to this page. Please make sure that all entries are free from political ideology and that your entries are factual and documented with external references.

In a hurry? Just fill add some details to one section if you know about this topic.

== Notes ==

Personal tools